Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20130417 20:14:39
My New Twin Prime NumbersConsider this equation Where all Pi are the consecutive primes, Pt is the Primeth Power, n is the nth of the Prime number, P1=2, and Ps is the resulting Prime. Example for smallest solution for each Primeth Power. For P=2, For P=3, Thanks to bobbym:) For P=5, Thanks to phrontister For P=7, Thanks to bobbym For P=11, For P=13, Thanks to phrontister Last edited by Stangerzv (20130424 22:34:05) #2 20130420 02:18:45
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersFor P=3 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20130420 02:34:11
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersDear bobbym Last edited by Stangerzv (20130420 02:34:49) #4 20130420 02:35:46
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6 20130420 02:44:35
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersFor P = 3, how is this? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #8 20130420 02:54:58
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersNext one is at: In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9 20130420 03:06:38
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersI think there are few more solutions for P=3, have you tried P=7 and I think there would be no solution at lower amount or no solution at all. #10 20130420 03:09:24
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersThere are 5 solutions for P = 3 using the first 1000 primes. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11 20130420 03:18:28
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersI do believe that if there is a solution it should occur at lower primes, as the prime number getting larger, it would be hard or impossible to find. Last edited by Stangerzv (20130420 03:19:11) #12 20130420 03:20:32
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersYes, the primes get rarer as the numbers get larger. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #13 20130420 11:49:39
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi bobbym #14 20130420 12:14:42
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #15 20130420 16:00:48
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersI see, for P=11, I got the result already but not 13 and above. #16 20130420 18:31:57
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #17 20130422 21:56:50
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #18 20130423 00:42:35
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi bobbym #19 20130423 02:46:56
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #20 20130423 09:12:33
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi bobbym #21 20130423 10:01:36
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #22 20130423 11:27:39
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersBasically, If there is no solution for P=13, it would be mind boggling to proof it so but if there is a solution, it would be very big. I am currently working on my equations and primes numbers, there are many more equations but I need someone to help me with the coding. There is someone suggesting me to use grid computing and the problem is that, I am not a programmer and I have left programming more than 10 years ago. Maybe I could apply for a research grant to study these prime numbers and work with collaborators. Last edited by Stangerzv (20130423 11:29:16) #23 20130423 14:56:47
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersGrid computing? Where are you going to get all the computers from? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #24 20130423 15:53:07
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersA university here did invite me to use their first grid computing to run my prime number equations. #25 20130423 18:07:03
Re: My New Twin Prime NumbersHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 