You are not logged in.
Hola juanpablo, ¡bienvenido al foro!
plotting the filing of f(x) = +√(x−1) and answer:
a) When is function : g(x) = x−1 ?. Write the answer in form algebraically.
Me temo que la traducción en inglés no es muy clara. ¿Puedes escribirlo en español? (Supongo que el español es tu lengua materna.)
If the sides of the rectangle are x and y, the perimeter is
The area is
By AMGM,
In your example, P = 34; work out the upper bound for A from the inequality above.
Let a,b be real numbers with a < b.
(1) Give an example of a continuous f on [a,b) which is not bounded.
(2) Give an example of a continuous f on [a,infinity) which is not bounded.
(3) Give an example of a bounded f on [a,b] for which sup_[a,b] f is not achieved.
(4) Give an example of a bounded, continuous f on [a,infinity) for which sup_[a,infinity) f is not achieved.
(5) Give an example of a bounded, continuous f on [a,b) for which sup_[a,b) f is not achieved.I just get so confused, I feel like i need to see the examples to understand them.
Im not doing your homework for you but Ill show you examples using intervals with 0 and 1 as end points so as to give you the picture of whats required. (Often examples explain things better than wordy definitions.)
If you get the idea, do the problems with a and b instead of 0 and 1.
Bumping this because after two and a half years nobody appears to have a solution yet.
I am bumping this thread to remind everyone how smart I was (and still am).
For the related problem with squares instead of rectangles, it turns out that the number of squares visible on an n×n square grid is
For a 3×3 grid in particular, the answer is 14. This actually came up in the final of University Challenge 200910, shown on Easter Monday. One idiot contestant actually buzzed with the ridiculous answer 6. I hate idiots!!
SCORE THREE GOALS
Proof:
If n is even, the sum is equal to
Do it this way.
A1: 1
A2: 2
B1: -1)^(A1+1)*A1^2
Drag copy handle on cell B1 down to B2. Then select the four cells A1:B2 and drag copy handle down to row 100.
Then enter this:
B101: =SUM(B1:B100)
IN GENERAL:
Test for Divisibility by a number of the form n = 10b+a, where b is a positive integer and a ∈ {1,3,7,9}
NB: n need not be prime for this to work. It only needs to be coprime with 10 (which such a number necessarily is). We consider the cases for a.
a = 1:
Subtract b times the last digit from the remaining truncated number.
a = 3:
Add 3b+1 times the last digit to the remaining truncated number.
a = 7:
Subtract 3b+2 times the last digit from the remaining truncated number.
a = 9:
Add b+1 times the last digit to the remaining truncated number.
Examples:
To test for divisibility by 53, add 3(5)+1 = 16 times the last digit to the truncated number. Thus, for 44944: 4494 + 16(4) = 4558; 455 + 16(8) = 583; 58 + 16(3) = 106; as 53∣106, 44944 is divisible by 53.
To test for divisibility by 91, subtract 9 times the last digit from the the truncated number. Thus for 55601: 5560 − 9(1) = 5551; 555 − 9(1) = 546; 54 − 9(6) = 0; as 91∣0, 55601 is divisible by 91.
Note that 91 = 7×13 is not prime. However, 91 is coprime with 10 and so the method works, enabling us to save time by not having to test for 7 and 13 separately.
Test for Divisibility by 31
Subtract three times the last digit from the remaining truncated number. If the result is divisible by 31, so will be the number.
Example: 111011
Steps:
11101 − 3(1) = 11098
1109 − 3(8) = 1085
108 − 3(5) = 93
Since 31∣93, the number is divisible by 19.
Right, now we know the trick, lets use it to devise more divisibility tests!
Test for Divisibility by 17
Subtract five times the last digit from the remaining truncated number. If the result is divisible by 17, so will be the number.
Example: 12342
Steps:
1234 − 5(2) = 1224
122 − 5(4) = 102
Since 17∣102, the number is divisible by 17.
Test for Divisibility by 19
Add twice the last digit to the remaining leading truncated number. If the result is divisible by 19, so will the number.
Example: 10203
Steps:
1020 + 2(3) = 1026
102 + 2(6) = 114
11 + 2(4) = 19
Since 19∣19, the number is divisible by 19.
Test for Divisibility by 7
- Double the last digit and subtract it from the remaining leading truncated number. If the result is divisible by 7, so will be the number
Example: 4991
Steps:
499 - 2(1) = 497
49 - 2(7) = 35
Since 7|35, the number is divisible by 7
Rearranging gives
, i.e.Very ingenious. (In fact
I suppose the divisibility test for 13 uses the same trick.
Its an octahedron with vertices at the points (±1,0,0), (0,±1,0), (0,0,±1).
That was what I was trying to say here:
Of course you can write (x) = 0. But you also have to specify that the domain is and not . Whoever said you cant probably meant that you cant just write and leave it there, but also have to indicate that the function is not defined at 0.
But you completely ignored me.
In other words, A takes 12 hours to paint the house, B takes 6 hours to paint the house, and C takes 24 hours to remove all the paint from the house.
No, is not defined at 0.
mmm...
my Doubt here is...
can i write f(x)=0??
can i Simplify the Terms in the Definition of the function?somebody told me that i CAN NOT do this...
Thanks to last nights University Challenge, I have found a new word for UOAIE: unsportsmanlike.
The programme also mentions the word unimportance for UIOAE. Unfortunately, this word is not in my Collins English Dictionary. (Unimportant is in there but not the noun.)
The answer should be IBERIAN. Thats SIBERIAN or LIBERIAN minus the first letter.