Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫  π  -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

## #1 2016-05-17 09:30:18

Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 141

### I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation

for any integer value of n strictly greater than two.

Let

where n >2

Then

must equal:

must have opposite remainders for

Adding y to one and minusing y from another will keep them opposite if they are already opposite. So let's see if the two squares have opposite remainders for
.

If we add them together they should=0 if they are opposite.

No!

Fermat's Last theorem is True.

"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

## #2 2016-05-17 19:05:52

Member
Registered: 2016-04-16
Posts: 1,086

### Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

What you are writing as remainder looks like quotient w.r.t c^n.

{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

Offline

## #3 2016-05-20 21:15:33

googol
Member
From: Delft, The Netherlands
Registered: 2016-04-22
Posts: 13

### Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Offline

## #4 2016-05-23 17:30:37

Member
Registered: 2016-04-16
Posts: 1,086

### Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

Now it looks like Primenumbers' LOST THEOREM

{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

Offline