Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2016-05-17 09:30:18

Primenumbers
Member
Registered: 2013-01-22
Posts: 131

I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

Fermat's Last Theorem states that no three positive integers a, b, and c satisfy the equation

for any integer value of n strictly greater than two.

Let

          where n >2

Then

    must equal:


must have opposite remainders for

Adding y to one and minusing y from another will keep them opposite if they are already opposite. So let's see if the two squares have opposite remainders for
.



If we add them together they should=0 if they are opposite.

No!

Fermat's Last theorem is True.


"Time not important. Only life important." - The Fifth Element 1997

Offline

#2 2016-05-17 19:05:52

thickhead
Member
Registered: 2016-04-16
Posts: 1,086

Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

What you are writing as remainder looks like quotient w.r.t c^n.


{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

Offline

#3 2016-05-20 21:15:33

googol
Member
From: Delft, The Netherlands
Registered: 2016-04-22
Posts: 13

Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.


10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

Offline

#4 2016-05-23 17:30:37

thickhead
Member
Registered: 2016-04-16
Posts: 1,086

Re: I think this is a new proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.

Now it looks like Primenumbers' LOST THEOREM smile


{1}Vasudhaiva Kutumakam.{The whole Universe is a family.}
(2)Yatra naaryasthu poojyanthe Ramanthe tatra Devataha
{Gods rejoice at those places where ladies are respected.}

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB