Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #26 2006-01-07 22:20:49
Re: Integral relationship>
Please visit below #27 2006-01-07 22:22:43
Re: Integral relationshipI'll visit this... now IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #28 2006-01-07 22:26:30
Re: Integral relationshipCool. So I was right! IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #29 2006-01-07 22:29:38
Re: Integral relationshipThis formula is unnatural from a commonsense standpoint, but this is natural if we look at this carefully. #30 2006-01-07 22:36:16
Re: Integral relationshipYes, it's just a matter of viewpoint. IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #31 2006-01-07 22:40:52
Re: Integral relationship
Thank you #33 2006-01-21 00:09:57
Re: Integral relationshipThe story behind the integral relationship #34 2006-01-31 00:43:01
Re: Integral relationshipLet x=x(t), y=y(t), z=z(t) #35 2006-01-31 23:57:59
Re: Integral relationshipThe above expression was posted to a forum of my homepage from some person. #36 2006-02-05 18:15:15
Re: Integral relationshipGood. I guess we can generalize this result for many functions. Last edited by krassi_holmz (2006-02-05 18:17:11) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #37 2006-04-10 23:01:09
Re: Integral relationshipI have removed a message to install a Japanese language pack. #38 2006-04-11 07:41:30
Re: Integral relationshipYour site is coming along well Keiichi Suzuki. I see you have links to Math Forum and others ... why not a link to this forum? "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #39 2006-04-11 22:42:03
Re: Integral relationshipI feel so grateful to you for giving me advice. |