Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #26 20060107 22:20:49
Re: Integral relationship>
Please visit below #27 20060107 22:22:43
Re: Integral relationshipI'll visit this... now IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #28 20060107 22:26:30
Re: Integral relationshipCool. So I was right! IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #29 20060107 22:29:38
Re: Integral relationshipThis formula is unnatural from a commonsense standpoint, but this is natural if we look at this carefully. #30 20060107 22:36:16
Re: Integral relationshipYes, it's just a matter of viewpoint. IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #31 20060107 22:40:52
Re: Integral relationship
Thank you #33 20060121 00:09:57
Re: Integral relationshipThe story behind the integral relationship #34 20060131 00:43:01
Re: Integral relationshipLet x=x(t), y=y(t), z=z(t) #35 20060131 23:57:59
Re: Integral relationshipThe above expression was posted to a forum of my homepage from some person. #36 20060205 18:15:15
Re: Integral relationshipGood. I guess we can generalize this result for many functions. Last edited by krassi_holmz (20060205 18:17:11) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #37 20060410 23:01:09
Re: Integral relationshipI have removed a message to install a Japanese language pack. #38 20060411 07:41:30
Re: Integral relationshipYour site is coming along well Keiichi Suzuki. I see you have links to Math Forum and others ... why not a link to this forum? "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  Leon M. Lederman #39 20060411 22:42:03
Re: Integral relationshipI feel so grateful to you for giving me advice. 