Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

no

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

There is a negative sign in there isn't there?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

2x- _ = _

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Is there a 4 in there?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,803
- Website

2x-5=5?

:

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

2x-4 = _

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

2 x - 4 = 6

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

Now not a eaquation

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Let me have a T...

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

no

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Then there must 11 R's in there.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

no

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Hi;

Give me an E!

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ e

Hey.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,803
- Website

a

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

How about an L?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,803
- Website

N

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

_ _ _ a _ _ l e

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Squabble?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

no

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Is there a D in there?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

no

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Hi;

You did say there was no R, up there in post #286?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

YEP.NO r

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,468

Hi;

There is no word that I know of like that. Can you tell me what it is?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline