Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#276 2013-01-12 14:53:08

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

no


Hey.
 

#277 2013-01-12 14:54:28

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

There is a negative sign in there isn't there?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#278 2013-01-12 15:22:23

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

2x- _ = _


Hey.
 

#279 2013-01-12 15:23:47

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Is there a 4 in there?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#280 2013-01-12 20:02:02

mathaholic
Star Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

2x-5=5?
dunno:


246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1)
 

#281 2013-01-13 01:34:00

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

2x-4 = _


Hey.
 

#282 2013-01-13 05:28:47

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

2 x - 4 = 6


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#283 2013-01-13 05:42:28

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

Now not a eaquation

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


Hey.
 

#284 2013-01-13 05:53:29

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Let me have a T...


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#285 2013-01-13 09:03:31

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

no


Hey.
 

#286 2013-01-13 09:26:12

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Then there must 11 R's in there.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#287 2013-01-13 09:34:07

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

no


Hey.
 

#288 2013-01-13 09:36:09

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Hi;

Give me an E!


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#289 2013-01-13 10:57:52

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ e


Hey.
 

#290 2013-01-13 11:03:54

mathaholic
Star Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

a


246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1)
 

#291 2013-01-13 11:08:10

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

How about an L?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#292 2013-01-13 11:14:23

mathaholic
Star Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

N


246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1)
 

#293 2013-01-13 11:15:27

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

_ _ _ a _ _ l e


Hey.
 

#294 2013-01-13 11:18:15

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Squabble?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#295 2013-01-13 12:12:09

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

no


Hey.
 

#296 2013-01-13 13:53:02

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Is there a D in there?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#297 2013-01-13 14:00:15

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

no


Hey.
 

#298 2013-01-13 14:53:35

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Hi;

You did say there was no R, up there in post #286?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#299 2013-01-14 00:04:57

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Re: Hangman 1

YEP.NO r


Hey.
 

#300 2013-01-14 00:12:43

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Hangman 1

Hi;

There is no word that I know of like that. Can you tell me what it is?


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB