Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #276 2013-01-12 14:53:08#277 2013-01-12 14:54:28
Re: Hangman 1There is a negative sign in there isn't there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #278 2013-01-12 15:22:23#279 2013-01-12 15:23:47
Re: Hangman 1Is there a 4 in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #280 2013-01-12 20:02:02
Re: Hangman 12x-5=5? Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture? #281 2013-01-13 01:34:00#282 2013-01-13 05:28:47
Re: Hangman 12 x - 4 = 6 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #283 2013-01-13 05:42:28
Re: Hangman 1Now not a eaquation woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #284 2013-01-13 05:53:29
Re: Hangman 1Let me have a T... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #285 2013-01-13 09:03:31#286 2013-01-13 09:26:12
Re: Hangman 1Then there must 11 R's in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #287 2013-01-13 09:34:07#288 2013-01-13 09:36:09
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #289 2013-01-13 10:57:52#290 2013-01-13 11:03:54
Re: Hangman 1a Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture? #291 2013-01-13 11:08:10
Re: Hangman 1How about an L? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #292 2013-01-13 11:14:23
Re: Hangman 1N Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture? #293 2013-01-13 11:15:27#294 2013-01-13 11:18:15
Re: Hangman 1Squabble? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #295 2013-01-13 12:12:09#296 2013-01-13 13:53:02
Re: Hangman 1Is there a D in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #297 2013-01-13 14:00:15#298 2013-01-13 14:53:35
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #299 2013-01-14 00:04:57#300 2013-01-14 00:12:43
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |