Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

54 must be the number.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

Yes divisble by 9 less than 100,000

*Last edited by mathgogocart (2012-06-16 04:32:56)*

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

Is that the answer?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**mathaholic****Member**- From: Juliania
- Registered: 2012-11-29
- Posts: 2,797
- Website

"Double the fun, double the thrill, double the coolness" - Julianthewiki

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

julianthemath wrote:

Yes!

Lower than 100.Diveisbile by 2.

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

2?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

no.....hint-not 2

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

50?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

We need more hints? How about 60.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

OK! I see now. 1-100 = -99 and it's even divisible by 3.

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

bobbym wrote:

We need more hints? How about 60.

OK,Youre right.

less than 0,divisble by 6.9

Hey.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

How do you defing divisibility by 6.9?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

It is 69?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

It must be less than zero and even...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

It is the only number divisible by 6.9

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

There is no number divisible by 6.9. Divisibility is defined on integers only.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

Kaboobly doo! I am only going on what I think he wants.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**noelevans****Member**- Registered: 2012-07-20
- Posts: 236

Why not define divisibility by: b divides a means a/b is an integer. Then for example (3/5)/(3/10)=2

and (.8)/(.2)=4 and (-.9)/(.3)=-3. So we could also say b divides a if and only if there exists an

integer k such that a=kb; that is, a is an integral multiple of b.

Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).

LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

new one-x≤100

div by 7

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

Hi;

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

bobbym wrote:

Hi;

no,

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

bobbym wrote:

Right.....NOOOOO!

A number that is irratiional.

Hey.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,432

Are we still on the same number?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mathgogocart****Member**- Registered: 2012-04-29
- Posts: 1,426

No.

Hint:Lower than 4,a decimal,has 3 dec numbers lik n.nnn

Hey.

Offline