Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#26 2012-05-27 02:39:27
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
54 must be the number.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#27 2012-06-16 12:00:07
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
Yes divisble by 9 less than 100,000
Last edited by mathgogocart (2012-06-17 02:32:56)
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#28 2012-06-16 19:43:00
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
Is that the answer?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#29 2012-12-14 22:58:58
- julianthemath
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture?
#30 2012-12-17 03:53:57
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
julianthemath wrote:
Yes!
Lower than 100.Diveisbile by 2.
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#31 2012-12-17 03:59:30
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
2?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#32 2012-12-17 04:04:36
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
no.....hint-not 2
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#33 2012-12-17 04:24:13
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
50?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#34 2012-12-17 09:45:37
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
We need more hints? How about 60.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#35 2012-12-17 10:11:41
- noelevans
- Full Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
OK! I see now. 1-100 = -99 and it's even divisible by 3.
Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).
LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.
#36 2012-12-18 06:47:09
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
bobbym wrote:
We need more hints? How about 60.
OK,Youre right.
less than 0,divisble by 6.9
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#37 2012-12-18 08:02:47
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
How do you defing divisibility by 6.9?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#38 2012-12-18 11:02:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
It is 69?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#39 2012-12-18 11:07:02
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
It must be less than zero and even...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#40 2012-12-18 11:10:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
It is the only number divisible by 6.9
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#41 2012-12-18 11:11:56
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
There is no number divisible by 6.9. Divisibility is defined on integers only.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#42 2012-12-18 11:13:10
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
Kaboobly doo! I am only going on what I think he wants.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#43 2012-12-18 16:01:10
- noelevans
- Full Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
Why not define divisibility by: b divides a means a/b is an integer. Then for example (3/5)/(3/10)=2
and (.8)/(.2)=4 and (-.9)/(.3)=-3. So we could also say b divides a if and only if there exists an
integer k such that a=kb; that is, a is an integral multiple of b. 
Writing "pretty" math (two dimensional) is easier to read and grasp than LaTex (one dimensional).
LaTex is like painting on many strips of paper and then stacking them to see what picture they make.
#44 2012-12-24 02:45:30
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
new one-x≤100
div by 7
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#45 2012-12-24 02:53:23
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#46 2012-12-26 03:40:42
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
bobbym wrote:
Hi;
no,
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#47 2012-12-26 03:46:05
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#48 2012-12-26 03:52:39
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
bobbym wrote:
Right.....NOOOOO!
A number that is irratiional.
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#49 2012-12-26 03:54:21
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: guess my number
Are we still on the same number?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#50 2012-12-26 04:00:46
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: guess my number
No.
Hint:Lower than 4,a decimal,has 3 dec numbers lik n.nnn
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.