Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-02-08 15:19:32
Permutation GeneratorHey everyone! I was wondering if someone can help me out. I have a math project and need a little help: #2 2012-02-08 18:21:32
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi aegiziano1, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #3 2012-02-08 18:43:31
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi all;
Generating functions can do this.
Unless there are only a few then you will need a computer. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2012-02-09 02:03:32
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi gAr, #5 2012-02-09 04:14:01
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi aegiziano1; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2012-02-09 14:56:33
Re: Permutation GeneratorGar, #7 2012-02-09 16:45:08
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi aegiziano1; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #8 2012-02-10 01:27:58
Re: Permutation GeneratorGar, #9 2012-02-10 01:54:48
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #10 2012-02-10 15:13:12
Re: Permutation GeneratorYes you got it!... Sorry for the confusion ... should have explained it better #11 2012-02-10 15:43:36
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi aegiziano1; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #12 2012-02-11 10:36:18
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi bobym, #13 2012-02-11 13:36:47
Re: Permutation Generator
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2012-02-11 23:57:30
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi all, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #15 2012-02-12 05:28:21
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #16 2012-02-12 05:33:02
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi bobbym, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #17 2012-02-12 05:39:54
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #18 2012-02-12 05:45:52
Re: Permutation GeneratorYou're welcome! "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #19 2012-02-12 05:48:38
Re: Permutation GeneratorSee you later,my friend. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2012-02-12 07:50:33
Re: Permutation GeneratorTwo of us worked hard on this. One of us solved it and the other one worked like a washing machine... In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #22 2012-02-12 18:45:13
Re: Permutation GeneratorEnjoyed it. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #23 2012-02-14 09:33:02
Re: Permutation GeneratorDear All #24 2012-02-14 11:50:01
Re: Permutation GeneratorHi Labodmin;
How many numbers are there? Are the numbers different? I used zeros as space holders so it would line up nice. That is 162 ways. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |