Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**123ronnie321****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 128

When I would glance at the newest registered user list I would often see the username - caty_____x

This is what I found http://www.mathisfunforum.com/userlist. … =ASC&p=389

and look at the following pages too!

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Hi 123ronnie321;

That is a popular username for some reason.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,654

May be a candidate for mass delete.

But what if catyhopofex is a real person? Or catylopyhex?

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**123ronnie321****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 128

That is a popular username for some reason.

And it has become extremely popular since March 2011.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Perhaps somebody is learning combinatorics with names!

And out of more than 118856 registered users, less than 4000 users have at least one post. Less than 4% !

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,654

Lurkers or bots.

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Hi MathsIsFun,

Yes, maybe.

Can something be done to make registration more difficult, like sending a verification code to the email address and user requiring to enter that during registration?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,654

Currently: you get sent a password in an email, so the "caty*" must be automatically reading that and responding. So annoying.

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Hmmm, I thought it was the same password we enter.

How about sending a simple equation to solve (addition, multiplication etc.), in a captcha if possible?

"Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Hi all;

How about this, another member just signed up. Guess what the username is, catyfopywex.

gAr wrote:

And out of more than 118856 registered users, less than 4000 users have at least one post. Less than 4% !

That has been like that since before I joined. That 96% could be spammers waiting and watching for the signal to launch a single, massive spam attack.

Okay, bear with me now. Imagine all 114,000 posting e-cigarettes, viagra, homes for sale, organ enhancements etc at the same time. It would surely crash us and would be a dilly trying to delete all those posts later. It would be sort of like a Spamaggedon.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Hi,

Yes, that's a possibility.

But many of those accounts are more than a year old.

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,654

gAr wrote:

But many of those accounts are more than a year old.

They are all waiting ... patiently ...

Hmmm, better take a backup.

Offline

**123ronnie321****Member**- Registered: 2010-09-28
- Posts: 128

Hi all,

I would like to give some ideas.

1 - While creating an account at gmail, Google asked me my cell phone no. and sent me a verification code through it.

If you allow only one username per phone no. then this may be stopped.

2 - Delete users that are inactive for a long time.

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,654

Deleting old inactive users is something I should examine.

Offline

**gAr****Member**- Registered: 2011-01-09
- Posts: 3,479

Hi MIF,

Take care that the number of posts = 0 before deleting.

Also, many users use signatures for advertising, is it better to disable hyperlinks in the signature section?

"Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay."

Offline

**bobbym****bumpkin**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 109,606

Hi all;

Also, many users use signatures for advertising, is it better to disable hyperlinks in the signature section?

I agree. Or at least have that a user needs 100 posts before he can use a link in his signature.

Update:

We have another! catywopmoex

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**** Always satisfy the Prime Directive of getting the right answer above all else.**

Offline