Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20110524 13:33:49
This looks mischievousWhen I would glance at the newest registered user list I would often see the username  caty_____x #2 20110524 16:51:26
Re: This looks mischievousHi 123ronnie321; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20110524 18:21:26
Re: This looks mischievousMay be a candidate for mass delete. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  Leon M. Lederman #4 20110524 20:05:23
Re: This looks mischievous
And it has become extremely popular since March 2011. #5 20110524 21:49:18
Re: This looks mischievousPerhaps somebody is learning combinatorics with names! "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #6 20110524 22:28:09
Re: This looks mischievousLurkers or bots. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  Leon M. Lederman #7 20110524 22:39:02
Re: This looks mischievousHi MathsIsFun, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #8 20110525 07:42:11
Re: This looks mischievousCurrently: you get sent a password in an email, so the "caty*" must be automatically reading that and responding. So annoying. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  Leon M. Lederman #9 20110525 12:34:40
Re: This looks mischievousHmmm, I thought it was the same password we enter. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #10 20110525 12:54:08
Re: This looks mischievousHi all;
That has been like that since before I joined. That 96% could be spammers waiting and watching for the signal to launch a single, massive spam attack. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #11 20110525 15:32:10
Re: This looks mischievousHi, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #12 20110525 20:17:02
Re: This looks mischievous
They are all waiting ... patiently ... "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  Leon M. Lederman #13 20110525 20:49:26
Re: This looks mischievousHi all, #14 20110525 22:26:32
Re: This looks mischievousDeleting old inactive users is something I should examine. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..."  Leon M. Lederman #15 20110525 22:35:41
Re: This looks mischievousHi MIF, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense"  Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #16 20110526 00:39:01
Re: This looks mischievousHi all;
I agree. Or at least have that a user needs 100 posts before he can use a link in his signature. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 