Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2011-05-24 13:33:49
This looks mischievousWhen I would glance at the newest registered user list I would often see the username - caty_____x #2 2011-05-24 16:51:26
Re: This looks mischievousHi 123ronnie321; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2011-05-24 18:21:26
Re: This looks mischievousMay be a candidate for mass delete. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #4 2011-05-24 20:05:23
Re: This looks mischievous
And it has become extremely popular since March 2011. #5 2011-05-24 21:49:18
Re: This looks mischievousPerhaps somebody is learning combinatorics with names! "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #6 2011-05-24 22:28:09
Re: This looks mischievousLurkers or bots. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #7 2011-05-24 22:39:02
Re: This looks mischievousHi MathsIsFun, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #8 2011-05-25 07:42:11
Re: This looks mischievousCurrently: you get sent a password in an email, so the "caty*" must be automatically reading that and responding. So annoying. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #9 2011-05-25 12:34:40
Re: This looks mischievousHmmm, I thought it was the same password we enter. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #10 2011-05-25 12:54:08
Re: This looks mischievousHi all;
That has been like that since before I joined. That 96% could be spammers waiting and watching for the signal to launch a single, massive spam attack. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2011-05-25 15:32:10
Re: This looks mischievousHi, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #12 2011-05-25 20:17:02
Re: This looks mischievous
They are all waiting ... patiently ... "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #13 2011-05-25 20:49:26
Re: This looks mischievousHi all, #14 2011-05-25 22:26:32
Re: This looks mischievousDeleting old inactive users is something I should examine. "The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman #15 2011-05-25 22:35:41
Re: This looks mischievousHi MIF, "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #16 2011-05-26 00:39:01
Re: This looks mischievousHi all;
I agree. Or at least have that a user needs 100 posts before he can use a link in his signature. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |