You are not logged in.
I am glad this nice forum helps you. Good luck in school and do check out the memory card games.
Without the factor 1 nothing is real since all real things has a factor 1. Elseways it would have a factor 0 and then it doesn't exist yet.
So I have a factor 1 because I grew from 0 to 1, from the unreal to the real, without knowing anything about it.
I hope you others also went real eventually, but I wouldn't know about it, so good luck with it.
Must be the highest status I suppose, to have a real factor, and I do think so, but then again there might be, a some few that are that...
Cameras can be hijacked, so naturally they are hijacked? Questions...
i am sorry LQ,but you confused me.xplain, plz?
Well, as long as we percept what we see and are not some kinda machine, I initially for a couple of days ago thought that any experience must have the factor one. Else the concept would have no volume. I just don't believe that anymore, but it's simple to slip under false presumptions, when one only remembers 22 or so years of 15 billion or more years. I simply presumed that if an experience couldn't have the factor one that it would have the factor 0 and not exist. It does sound correct.
Purpose: Exist in the true sence; have the factor one and have fun.
Who is the safest, the man with the gun or the man with the shield?
Well the man with the gun ofcourse. That's why one should not strive for being safe.
USA got nukes. They are reall in the sence that they can blow up, and whatever we are, we seem to have feelings the way feelings are defined. There is nothing saying that these bombs wont cause feelings the way feelings are defined, that's what makes safety so unsafe. To be safe you have to know what happens around you I fear that the world we live in is a recursive soul, trying to imitate the reality. Then i wish for it to stop it, for the whole world with these humans just created the big bomb (wasn't long ago), and if its feeling were imitated, i fear all our souls may break. So it's not safe to imitate the human race anymore for any soul. That's what I believe, good night.
So I make a polygon with the radius 1 to the middle of a side, the radius s to a corner and the outer side T. if infinity is a prime number, then naturally p*T --> 2pi
Can one derive all primes p from this, plainly?
If the mass is bound to something real it isn't just math anymore, if it isn't it's just the usual jaddah. I have still to see a calculus hard enough that wasn't more harmless then periless for the mind to see without any day to day applications. Perhaps I'm wrong. Mathematicians don't allways live very long though.
I recon since the moon causes waves, and a more even climate through winds etc, the effect on earth is extreme, infact, it is a factor of life.
without is, the seas would go blank and reflect all solarlight into space, in other words out from the earth again, and it would be extremely cold, and at midday extremely hot. If the moon flew away, the earth would not only fly in the opposit direction and get a new orbit around the sun, it would also make the planet x% more light on us, and no waves, no tide and dark at night.
Discuss this please.
How could anything go wrong?
Life has survived quite alot you know, maybe the sun is not so hot after all, maybe we can steal its candy, ey?
I suppose there will be something good left even if the polar bear dies... I s'pose no one will eat it?
I just don't know anymore, if this place is under 9 meters of water, then maybe I'll do something.
and if the moon goes away, I imagine it will get slightly a bit hotter...
like 3%, and that just does it, I'm swimming over to a safer place, how about a place that doesn't actually move in circles in a circle around a bigger circle...
The big question is probably, is it really that bad inside the sun?
I imagine a black hole is probably much worse.
I s'pose he didn' mean me?
but it has the same speed as the earth though?
As an accident. And when will it happen? Because the moon is not getting further in, it's getting further out, and I believe not many planets have moons that far out, so it would collide by accident most likely. When? because if it leaves the earth, wouldn't it seemingly get the same orbit as the earth. Mathematically I believe it could get no other orbit. Since the meteors probably comes from the sides, so that's where it gets its momentum. And then it's never gonna go out, nor in, it's gonna have the same orbit around the sun as earth...?
well, with gravitomagnetism... when the sun comes close to the galaxy axis, it is gonna move slower/quicker through, what with all the dust there. We wont notice anything until after.... We will be a bit out of course, that's all it needs to destroy, a little out of course
How about a white dwarf?
Composed by a lightspread or lightweave or anything. Just as long as it isn't a big threat to mankind we should build something as protection.
Vad om det svarta hålet fortsätter evaporisera massa den inte har?
Skulle big rip inträffa?
What if the black hole in cern continue evaporating mass even though in itself it doesn't have it?
the number one reason why you shouldn't make black holes unless you are sure on what you are doing?
And I hope you ain't gonna do Red Matter then... But I believe I know on an about how you do it, you just remove the forcefields with a lowfrequency but strong lightbeam at the center of the core, that doesn't heat it up. Right?
Just don't do it, I tell you, It'll be big rip or big bang or a whole to the other side of where black holes lead, and then we are in serious trouble.
My theory? I believe it will continue to evaporate and have negative mass, and then the mass from the other side of the tunnel will find a way through, and there can be alot of mass there... the evaporation could be proportionall to sqrt(1/m), but now I'm just thinking subconsciously, and I allways do that for a reason...
because if it evaporate in speed of light, with negative mass, then there will be a darned white whole there. gonna let out alot of stuff, it'll be cool and stuff, but perhaps keep it away from earth?
PS. I recon there is alot of light on the other side of the tunnel, so basically it's gonna let alot of it through from the side black holes evaporate too.
having it there. That's what I meant.
So it's fahrenheit that is the velocity squared then? Well I don't remember much from physics, but shouldn't it be a very high jump anyway? cause I was thinking that the photon income is proportional to speed squared and hence temperature.
anyone has the right answer to how hot it would be with 30% more sunlight? Or if that is the one, then wouldn't it still be very hot?
that's like 31 degrees celcius... Well that's still too much.
imagine that you and your cusin switch place; the prevail has allmost allready been utterly pointless. Now imagine that you send an ant into space and let it collonize another planet; The prevail has emediatly become negative. Imagine then that the ant calls himself god... I'd know what to tell it.
So the purpose is actually negative! It would destroy our variated space and transmute it into asfalt.
Can someone prove this before I go nuts.
It will be perhaps 30 percent hotter.
293.5kelvin*1.30 = 381.5kelvin = 108 degrees celsius. Let's take the fastest train out of here.
Perhaps only chicken will be on the news then. Fried chicken.
Nah, It didn't get all through, besides I meant exceed, not preceed.
ΔE = h Δν
But the black holes energy cannot escape it's radius by no more then teleporting out into a quantum trace.
So since any black hole made on earth would have the mass of perhaps 2 nukes energy, (20 gram perhaps).
The temporary mass growth would be hΔv/c^2
so with the de-broglie formulae we have: wavelength = h/(mv)
But derivate as a function of time like this:
D(1/v = wavelength*m/h = t/l)
= 1/l
Δm = h*length/wavelength
which means that since:
length = v*(evaporation time)
Δm = h*v*(evaporation time)/wavelength
compared with m which is:
m = h/(wavelength*v)
so the mass will increase with:
Δm/m = v^2*(evaporation time) procent.
This mass cannot go anywhere so it teleport out through a quantum trace. And I'm gonna believe the worst. It's gonna be a black hole when it comes out.
when m is the smallest mass, v will be c, then this will happen:
Δm/m = c^2*(evaporation time) procent.
v/wavelength is allways c, i presume.
so Δm = hc*(evaporation time)
Because of the heat of the sand, the wind grows stronger and push the clouds away. But with stone in the dessert, the clouds will draw away slower and rain.
Because of the stones in scandinavia and other rainy places, it will rain very much because of the climate change. So we need to remove the stones away from scandinavia in order to feel heat.
So the clouds will draw away quicker from sweden if we remove the stones from this country...
So why not transport the stones the heck away from all rainy places and put them in the dessert.? Not all of it ofcourse..
both comments are agreable.
So bush got nuclear weapons right? I dunno, what's worse..