Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#1 2010-01-24 10:20:50

LQ
Real Member

Offline

Why to not strive for being safe

Who is the safest, the man with the gun or the man with the shield?
Well the man with the gun ofcourse. That's why one should not strive for being safe.
USA got nukes. They are reall in the sence that they can blow up, and whatever we are, we seem to have feelings the way feelings are defined. There is nothing saying that these bombs wont cause feelings the way feelings are defined, that's what makes safety so unsafe. To be safe you have to know what happens around you I fear that the world we live in is a recursive soul, trying to imitate the reality. Then i wish for it to stop it, for the whole world with these humans just created the big bomb (wasn't long ago), and if its feeling were imitated, i fear all our souls may break. So it's not safe to imitate the human race anymore for any soul. That's what I believe, good night.


I see clearly now, the universe have the black dots, Thus I am on my way of inventing this remedy...
 

#2 2010-01-24 12:57:29

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Why to not strive for being safe

Hi LQ;

Conversation taking place in Nevada a while back at the height of the Cold War.

A) Aren't you afraid of the fact that both sides have thousands of ICBM's aimed at each other and this is a primary target?

B) No.

A) Why not?

B) As you well know people like you worked on those things. The ones over there are not even capable of getting out of their silos. The ones here are almost as bad.

A) Are you implying that inept mathematicians, physicists, engineers and technicians have crippled the superpowers nuclear capabilities?

B) Yea, and they had help.

A) From who?

B) You live here and you don't know?

Sleep tight LQ, nuclear holocaust isn't in the cards.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#3 2010-01-24 13:15:16

John E. Franklin
Star Member

Offline

Re: Why to not strive for being safe

Maybe we should attempt to build a super-shield that blocks all nuclear reactions in the Universe.
Then would the sun go out?  It might be a bad idea...


igloo myrtilles fourmis
 

#4 2010-01-24 14:35:09

Identity
Power Member

Offline

Re: Why to not strive for being safe

bobbym, what do you think the person meant by "you live here and you don't know"? Who helped?

 

#5 2010-01-24 15:51:36

bobbym
Administrator

Online

Re: Why to not strive for being safe

Hi identity;

Woops, didn't think I would have to follow up on this one. Have a feeling I will regret that post but...

First some background:

Nevada - a state of which 87% of the land is controlled by the gov. You must have heard of the S*kun**kwor*k*s, Dr*e*aml*and,Gr**oo*m L**ak*e, Ar**e*a fif***ty o*n*e.

B was a man of incredible integrity and intelligence and is now deceased. A, though superior and mathematically and computer capable, is somewhat kooky. He was rumored to have worked at the Te**s*t S**i*t*e as well as several large casinos.

I think the gist is since the Truman era those devices have been taken out of human hands.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#6 2010-01-25 22:04:51

Identity
Power Member

Offline

Re: Why to not strive for being safe

lol, that is... interesting  o.O

 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB