Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2006-02-05 14:49:32

mikau
Member
Registered: 2005-08-22
Posts: 1,504

proof legendary does not necessarily equal smart

If we were wondering, are all legendary people smart? Or do you have to be smart to be legendary? Or does being smart automaticly make me legendary? Well one little test will answer this for us.

All of these questions are basicly asking if smart = legendary. If any substitution of one for the other produces a false statement, it is not always true. (though it would not prove it is never true)

For this proof you need to know the transiative butt property which our friend strongbad can demonstrate here:

http://homestarrunner.com/sbemail3.html

Ok. So if butt iq <= head iq, read it backwards and it confirms if you have a smart butt, it garentees you have a smart head.

smart head >= smart butt

if it were true legendary = smart   then:

smart head >= legendary butt

For those who find this statement confusing it basicly means that the smartness of a persons head is greater then or equal to the legendarity of their butt. But Jennifer Lopez clearly demonstrated a legendary butt does not garentee a smart head therefore the substitution "legendary = smart"  was invalid.

Hence legendary does not necessarily equal smart. Quod Erat Demonstratum.

Last edited by mikau (2006-02-05 14:59:53)


A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.

Offline

#2 2006-02-05 14:54:36

Chimera
Member
Registered: 2006-02-04
Posts: 2

Re: proof legendary does not necessarily equal smart

I concur! Or perhaps it renders the transiative butt property null and void?

Offline

#3 2006-02-06 06:03:15

mathsyperson
Moderator
Registered: 2005-06-22
Posts: 4,900

Re: proof legendary does not necessarily equal smart

Alternatively, it could mean that stupidity is not the inverse of intelligence.

Or, it could mean that there's a difference between having a smart head and being smart.

Double-or, it could mean that I should stop looking too much into this as it's just a joke. ^_^


Why did the vector cross the road?
It wanted to be normal.

Offline

#4 2006-02-06 06:43:19

mikau
Member
Registered: 2005-08-22
Posts: 1,504

Re: proof legendary does not necessarily equal smart

Hey the deeper we dig into this the funnier it gets! :-D


A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm.

Offline

#5 2008-01-07 10:23:21

MasterofDisguise
Member
Registered: 2008-01-05
Posts: 68

Re: proof legendary does not necessarily equal smart

Its kinda weird for an equation i mean a legendary butt?


(im an ALIEN eek) im kool tongue (WHAT what You cant steal my fridge!)]

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB