Math Is Fun Forum

  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

#1 2007-12-15 16:19:47

Identity
Member
Registered: 2007-04-18
Posts: 934

acceptable proof?

Is this an acceptable proof? I have a feeling it is flawed somehow.

Let

. Prove that:

For n = 1, we have

, which is true.

We make the assumption that:

for

Taking n = k,

Multiplying both sides by k+1,

Since

, we can divide them out and we are left with

, which is true.

Thus the proposition is true, QED

Last edited by Identity (2007-12-15 16:27:24)

Offline

#2 2007-12-15 17:06:49

Ricky
Moderator
Registered: 2005-12-04
Posts: 3,791

Re: acceptable proof?

You are forgetting that you must show


"In the real world, this would be a problem.  But in mathematics, we can just define a place where this problem doesn't exist.  So we'll go ahead and do that now..."

Offline

#3 2007-12-17 01:37:37

TheDude
Member
Registered: 2007-10-23
Posts: 361

Re: acceptable proof?

Yep, it looks like you tried to prove the induction step backwards.  You started with an assumption for k and tried to move forward to the k+1 step.  You're supposed to start with the k+1 step and then work your way backwards until you can use your assumption for k to prove your inequality.  What you need to do is take what Ricky posted and simplify it until you can use your assumption of k to prove the induction.


Wrap it in bacon

Offline

#4 2007-12-17 03:10:20

JaneFairfax
Member
Registered: 2007-02-23
Posts: 6,868

Re: acceptable proof?

Last edited by JaneFairfax (2007-12-17 03:10:47)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB