You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,608

Made this (repurposed the Function Grapher): Inequality Grapher

How is it?

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 102,800

Hi MIF;

Look like a really nice grapher. Very good.

How about adding the capability for 1 or 2 more equations.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**ganesh****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 20,335

Hi MathsIsFun,

The Inequality Grapher works very well!

Remarkable page!

It is no good to try to stop knowledge from going forward. Ignorance is never better than knowledge - Enrico Fermi.

Nothing is better than reading and gaining more and more knowledge - Stephen William Hawking.

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,524

Hi MathsIsFun,

Love it. Really useful!

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,648

Very nice!

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,608

Thanks Guys!

It should be possible to add more equations, I just need to do some tricky coding is all.

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 102,800

Hi;

When you succeed it will be easy to create a graphic linear programming solver.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,608

Almost there ... is 3 enough? 4?

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 102,800

Hi MIF;

I was thinking of 4. If 4 is possible then 4 is good.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,608

4? You want 4? I think 4 is possible. 4 should definitely be possible. I will try for 4.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 102,800

Hi MIF;

4 would be good.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

This applet is really good. Never seen such a web resource before

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

I'm not crazy, my mother had me tested.

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,608

4? Was it 4 you wanted? Better than 4, I give you **n**: Inequality Grapher

(Use the +/- buttons below the y= ... and do a refresh if you can't see them.)

Hopefully I haven't wrecked it in the process, but I am sure you will all let me know if it still works nicely

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 7,524

**Oh Joy!**

Bob

Children are not defined by school ...........The Fonz

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 102,800

Axiom:More is better.

n is greater than 4 when n>4. This can be proved by induction. So, n is better than 4 when n>4. I am happy.

Worked on a whole bunch of linear programming problems and obviously could work on quadratic programming too.

Future suggestions:

How about showing the coordinates of the feasible points?

Depending on how you solved the problem this could be a hanger or it could be difficult.

All in all, very good work!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.****If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,608

Love the screenshot!

Points: I can't think of a point-finding algorithm. But you can use the "Points" button and zoom in for more accuracy.

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,648

Great work!

Offline