Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,559

Made this (repurposed the Function Grapher): Inequality Grapher

How is it?

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 92,879

Hi MIF;

Look like a really nice grapher. Very good.

How about adding the capability for 1 or 2 more equations.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**ganesh****Moderator**- Registered: 2005-06-28
- Posts: 16,040

Hi MathsIsFun,

The Inequality Grapher works very well!

Remarkable page!

Character is who you are when no one is looking.

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,786

Hi MathsIsFun,

Love it. Really useful!

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,640

Very nice!

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,559

Thanks Guys!

It should be possible to add more equations, I just need to do some tricky coding is all.

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 92,879

Hi;

When you succeed it will be easy to create a graphic linear programming solver.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,559

Almost there ... is 3 enough? 4?

"The physicists defer only to mathematicians, and the mathematicians defer only to God ..." - Leon M. Lederman

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 92,879

Hi MIF;

I was thinking of 4. If 4 is possible then 4 is good.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,559

4? You want 4? I think 4 is possible. 4 should definitely be possible. I will try for 4.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 92,879

Hi MIF;

4 would be good.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

This applet is really good. Never seen such a web resource before

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'You have made another human being happy. There is no greater accomplishment.' -bobbym

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,559

4? Was it 4 you wanted? Better than 4, I give you **n**: Inequality Grapher

(Use the +/- buttons below the y= ... and do a refresh if you can't see them.)

Hopefully I haven't wrecked it in the process, but I am sure you will all let me know if it still works nicely

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,786

**Oh Joy!**

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 92,879

Axiom:More is better.

n is greater than 4 when n>4. This can be proved by induction. So, n is better than 4 when n>4. I am happy.

Worked on a whole bunch of linear programming problems and obviously could work on quadratic programming too.

Future suggestions:

How about showing the coordinates of the feasible points?

Depending on how you solved the problem this could be a hanger or it could be difficult.

All in all, very good work!

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**MathsIsFun****Administrator**- Registered: 2005-01-21
- Posts: 7,559

Love the screenshot!

Points: I can't think of a point-finding algorithm. But you can use the "Points" button and zoom in for more accuracy.

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,640

Great work!

Offline