You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**evinda****Member**- Registered: 2013-04-13
- Posts: 105

But the Wronkian should be nonzero..So,what do I have to do??

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

I do not know why it should be non zero.

Did you compute the Wronskian?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**evinda****Member**- Registered: 2013-04-13
- Posts: 105

bobbym wrote:

I do not know why it should be non zero.

Did you compute the Wronskian?

Because there is a theorem that says that if two solutions of a differential equation are linearly independent,their Wronskian is nonzero!!!

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

How do you know the two solutions are linearly independent?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**evinda****Member**- Registered: 2013-04-13
- Posts: 105

bobbym wrote:

How do you know the two solutions are linearly independent?

Because the exercise says that v1,v2 are solutions of the differential equation so that

is not constant..So,.So, ...

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

That is true but have you used the solutions to compute the wronskian?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**evinda****Member**- Registered: 2013-04-13
- Posts: 105

bobbym wrote:

That is true but have you used the solutions to compute the wronskian?

Can't I just write that the Wronskian is equal to:

| v_{1}(0) (v_{1}(0))' |

| v_{2}(0) (v_{2}(0))' |

Do you mean that I have to solve the differential equation that is given for

and ?*Last edited by evinda (2013-12-12 08:37:26)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

Of course you do, but you already got the solution to DE earlier.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**evinda****Member**- Registered: 2013-04-13
- Posts: 105

bobbym wrote:

Of course you do, but you already got the solution to DE earlier.

But then don't we find that v1(x)=v2(x) ? Or not? I haven't understood...

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

That is what I am saying. If there is only one solution. Is there another solution?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**evinda****Member**- Registered: 2013-04-13
- Posts: 105

bobbym wrote:

That is what I am saying. If there is only one solution. Is there another solution?

There should be..because v1 and v2 are linearly independent

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

What is the other solution?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,673

There are infinitely many solutions.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

**Online**

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 90,737

Yes but when you plug them into that determinant they are going to become 0.

We have no particular solution just a 1 general one. To continue with this route he will need 2 different general solutions.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

Offline