Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20130812 19:30:23
Standard Form.Simplify the following, leaving your answer in standard form. #3 20130812 19:58:29
Re: Standard Form.1). I had 6.0 * 10^15 Last edited by EbenezerSon (20130812 20:09:07) #4 20130812 20:13:50
Re: Standard Form.Okay, 1) looks like this? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20130812 20:19:21
Re: Standard Form.Yes. But all are in a square root. #8 20130812 20:34:58
Re: Standard Form.You were close I am getting 6 x 10^7 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #12 20130812 20:55:35
Re: Standard Form.Very good. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #14 20130812 21:08:40
Re: Standard Form.Leave out the 10^0, it is 1. We do not show multiplication by 1. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #15 20130812 21:18:05
Re: Standard Form.0.36 * 1012 #16 20130812 21:23:28
Re: Standard Form.Very good. It is awful making a human being do such calculations. We have machinery for that nowadays. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #17 20130812 21:43:30
Re: Standard Form.Yes, Bobbym. #18 20130812 21:52:10
Re: Standard Form.That book has a sense of humor at least. I am getting the same answer as 1).
No thanks required. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #19 20130812 22:14:32
Re: Standard Form.Yes I tried to solve it once again and now I have the same answer as the first one, The root was my main problem, but now I have known how to go about that. #20 20130812 22:16:50
Re: Standard Form.Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #22 20130813 00:53:43
Re: Standard Form.Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 