How to find n in the equation:
By trial and error I found that n=164. But is it possible to express n for a direct calculation? How did people solve such problems before the age of computers?
Last edited by White_Owl (2013-04-07 13:29:24)
If it ain't broke, fix it until it is.
A number by itself is useful, but it is far more useful to know how accurate or certain that number is.