How to find n in the equation:
By trial and error I found that n=164. But is it possible to express n for a direct calculation? How did people solve such problems before the age of computers?
Last edited by White_Owl (2013-04-07 13:29:24)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.