Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2013-03-19 20:52:46
Conditional probabilityProbably an easy one for many of you out there... #2 2013-03-19 20:57:04
Re: Conditional probabilityHi;
Welcome to the forum. Do you understand the hypergeometric distribution? Last edited by bobbym (2013-03-19 21:01:28) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2013-03-19 22:33:24
Re: Conditional probabilityThe hypergeometric distribution is for sampling without replacement. winners = 4 ( there are 4 kings ) population = 52 ( 52 cards in the deck ) trials = 40 (40 draws ) k = 4 (you want all 4 kings ) For 2) I will need more information. Last edited by bobbym (2013-03-19 23:02:12) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2013-03-20 01:45:23
Re: Conditional probabilitySo what about replacing them in the deck? #7 2013-03-20 06:15:06
Re: Conditional probabilityHi;
I am sorry, I am not following you. Please be a bit more specific. An example would be nice. Last edited by bobbym (2013-03-20 06:38:18) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |