Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #3 20130226 03:58:07
Re: no. of divisersThe number of positive divisors of (where the are distinct primes) is . #4 20130226 12:33:17
Re: no. of divisersHi scientia The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #5 20130227 01:11:50
Re: no. of divisersOops, pardon me. #6 20130227 05:29:10
Re: no. of divisersHi scientia The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #8 20130227 06:38:07
Re: no. of divisershi bobbym The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #9 20130227 06:43:52
Re: no. of divisersHi; Last edited by bobbym (20130227 06:44:53) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10 20130227 06:54:06
Re: no. of divisersBoth! The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #11 20130227 07:34:44
Re: no. of divisersThe mighty aardvark thanks you. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #12 20130227 07:36:28
Re: no. of divisersWhat about bobbym? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #13 20130227 07:39:03
Re: no. of divisersI will ask him when I see him but he is unpredictable. He does not take a compliment well. Last edited by bobbym (20130227 07:42:49) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #14 20130227 07:52:13
Re: no. of divisersThat's too bad. I really have a lot of compliments for him. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #15 20130227 07:58:02
Re: no. of divisersI happen to know you are one of his favorite people and he admires you very much. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #16 20130227 07:58:52
Re: no. of divisersAdmires me for what? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #17 20130227 08:03:59
Re: no. of divisersHe said he thinks you will be a fine adult and a great mathematician. He puts you in his top 5 of the best he has seen. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #18 20130227 08:05:32
Re: no. of divisersI'm not sure if that is a good measure, considering how much sunlight he sees. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #19 20130227 08:09:44
Re: no. of divisers5 or so people that are amazing to him.
So when a person is headed for greatness and misses the mark by falling short, that person will still shine. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #20 20130227 08:15:35
Re: no. of divisersAmazing can also be in a negative way. I sure hope you don't mean that!
Was this a question or a statement? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #21 20130227 08:20:35
Re: no. of divisersHmmm, the negative attributes of people do not amaze me, except at how stupid such people are to act that way. Last edited by bobbym (20130227 08:24:32) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #22 20130227 08:28:40
Re: no. of divisersHow is a person meant for greatness supposed to shine if he doesn't do something great? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #23 20130227 08:34:13
Re: no. of divisersHahhahahahahhahhahha?! Do you know who Dr. Mifune is? I did not think so! Well, he is a guy with a great laugh and I have copied it. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #24 20130227 08:37:33
Re: no. of divisersOk, see you. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #25 20130227 14:28:25
Re: no. of divisers
What? I am constant as the northern star. Forget? Impossible! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 