You are not logged in.
#2 2013-02-25 20:42:56
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hi jacks;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#3 2013-02-26 03:58:07
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
The number of positive divisors of
(where the are distinct primes) is .
#4 2013-02-26 12:33:17
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hi scientia
He needs the divisors of the form 4n+1.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#5 2013-02-27 01:11:50
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Oops, pardon me.
#6 2013-02-27 05:29:10
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hi scientia
It's ok. Happens to me a lot, too. 
Hi jacks
I believe bobbym's right.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#7 2013-02-27 06:18:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#8 2013-02-27 06:38:07
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
hi bobbym
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#9 2013-02-27 06:43:52
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hi;
Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-27 06:44:53)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#10 2013-02-27 06:54:06
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Both!
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#11 2013-02-27 07:34:44
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
The mighty aardvark thanks you.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#12 2013-02-27 07:36:28
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
What about bobbym?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#13 2013-02-27 07:39:03
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
I will ask him when I see him but he is unpredictable. He does not take a compliment well.
Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-27 07:42:49)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#14 2013-02-27 07:52:13
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
That's too bad. I really have a lot of compliments for him.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#15 2013-02-27 07:58:02
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
I happen to know you are one of his favorite people and he admires you very much.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#16 2013-02-27 07:58:52
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Admires me for what?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#17 2013-02-27 08:03:59
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
He said he thinks you will be a fine adult and a great mathematician. He puts you in his top 5 of the best he has seen.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#18 2013-02-27 08:05:32
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
I'm not sure if that is a good measure, considering how much sunlight he sees.
Top 5 what?
And, either way, he is probably not correct.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#19 2013-02-27 08:09:44
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
5 or so people that are amazing to him.
And, either way, he is probably not correct.
So when a person is headed for greatness and misses the mark by falling short, that person will still shine.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#20 2013-02-27 08:15:35
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Amazing can also be in a negative way. I sure hope you don't mean that!
bobbym wrote:
So when a person is headed for greatness and misses the mark by falling short, that person will still shine.
Was this a question or a statement?
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#21 2013-02-27 08:20:35
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hmmm, the negative attributes of people do not amaze me, except at how stupid such people are to act that way.
I meant people of great ability.
It was a statement of course.
I am off to go shopping see you.
Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-27 08:24:32)
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#22 2013-02-27 08:28:40
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
How is a person meant for greatness supposed to shine if he doesn't do something great?
See you later. Please do not forget anything like you did last time.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#23 2013-02-27 08:34:13
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Hahhahahahahhahhahha?! Do you know who Dr. Mifune is? I did not think so! Well, he is a guy with a great laugh and I have copied it.
Shopping I must go.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#24 2013-02-27 08:37:33
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Ok, see you.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#25 2013-02-27 14:28:25
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: no. of divisers
Please do not forget anything like you did last time.
What? I am constant as the northern star. Forget? Impossible!
Dorothy: Your Majesty, if you were king, you wouldn't be afraid of anything?
Cowardly Lion: Not nobody! Not nohow!
Tin Woodsman: Not even a rhinoceros?
Cowardly Lion: Imposerous!
Dorothy: How about a hippopotamus?
Cowardly Lion: Why, I'd thrash him from top to bottomus!
Dorothy: Supposing you met an elephant?
Cowardly Lion: I'd wrap him up in cellephant!
Scarecrow: What if it were a brontosaurus?
Cowardly Lion: I'd show him who was king of the forest!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.