You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**{7/3}****Member**- Registered: 2013-02-11
- Posts: 210

Hi, I think i have found a way to use induction for integer set too (don't know if it was discovered before this post) by extending the axiom of induction we get "if S is a subset of Z and (a) 0 belongs to S,(b) for n belonging to S (n+1) belongs to S,(c)for n belonging to S (n-1) belongs to S ,then S=Z." if I'm wrong I hope others will correct me.

There are 10 kinds of people in the world,people who understand binary and people who don't.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: Harlan's World
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 16,015

I think (c) is unneccessary there, and the rest just represents the axiom of induction.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**{7/3}****Member**- Registered: 2013-02-11
- Posts: 210

By (c) i stated that -1,-2,-3,-4,... are in S,the general axiom doesn't state that.

There are 10 kinds of people in the world,people who understand binary and people who don't.

Offline

**scientia****Member**- Registered: 2009-11-13
- Posts: 224

anonimnystefy wrote:

It is necessary. This is the induction law for , not .
I think (c) is unneccessary there, and the rest just represents the axiom of induction.

*Last edited by scientia (2013-02-17 23:36:12)*

Offline

**{7/3}****Member**- Registered: 2013-02-11
- Posts: 210

So,can this axiom be used to prove stuff for integers?

There are 10 kinds of people in the world,people who understand binary and people who don't.

Offline

**scientia****Member**- Registered: 2009-11-13
- Posts: 224

It looks fine to me. However proving stuff about integers is usually much more straightforward: first prove that the property holds for all non-negative integers, then show that it also holds for where is a non-negative integer.

Offline

Pages: **1**