Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #3 20130131 03:11:32
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsHi mttal24; for c is any constant. The second one is a little tougher. When reduced it becomes: which you can now use l'Hopitals rule on. Or you can make use of a very important formula. when n < m. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #4 20130131 03:55:05
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsYour last formula should have x tebd to infinity, because otherwise it is infinity... The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #5 20130131 03:58:44
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsYes, I know it was a latex error, I have corrected it while you were posting. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6 20130201 00:58:55
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsThat is okay now. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #7 20130201 01:02:13
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorials
Hmmmm. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #8 20130201 01:04:32
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsWhat? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #9 20130201 01:09:13
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsNothing, I was just going Hmmmm. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10 20130201 01:25:44
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsI know, but that usually has more to it than just saying ’Hmmmm’ for no reason... The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #11 20130201 02:20:42
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsThe closer we get to 2 / 5 / 2013 the more hmmmming I will be doing. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #12 20130201 02:37:08
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorials5th of February? Why? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #13 20130201 02:44:44
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialshttp://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 67#p201867 In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #14 20130201 06:53:56
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsThat post was on 18th, which makes 12th the pivotal day... The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #15 20130201 07:08:47
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsOh yes, the 12th. That will come around pretty quick. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #16 20130201 07:11:14
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsYeah, but it's nothing special... The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #17 20130201 07:20:04
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsWhy isn't it special? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #18 20130201 07:23:55
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsWhy should it be? The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #19 20130201 07:26:02
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsNothing to continue about. I will make a forum announcement on that day. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #21 20130202 01:06:14
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #23 20130202 01:10:30
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #25 20130202 01:13:15
Re: Limits n>infinity questions on factorialsHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 