You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**mttal24****Member**- Registered: 2012-05-01
- Posts: 23

I am trying to solve questions like:

1.

and

2.

How do I solve them?

for the first one, i get upto lim 1/n+2. Then what should I do?

*Last edited by mttal24 (2013-01-30 03:57:36)*

Offline

**bob bundy****Moderator**- Registered: 2010-06-20
- Posts: 6,092

hi mttal24

Yes, so you have done it because that fraction tends to zero as n tends to infinity.

Bob

You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Hi mttal24;

This one is good to memorize

for c is any constant.

The second one is a little tougher.

When reduced it becomes:

which you can now use l'Hopitals rule on. Or you can make use of a very important formula.

when n < m.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

Your last formula should have x tebd to infinity, because otherwise it is infinity...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Yes, I know it was a latex error, I have corrected it while you were posting.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

That is okay now.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

That is okay now.

Hmmmm.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

What?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Nothing, I was just going Hmmmm.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

I know, but that usually has more to it than just saying Hmmmm for no reason...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

The closer we get to 2 / 5 / 2013 the more hmmmming I will be doing.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

5th of February? Why?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

http://www.mathisfunforum.com/viewtopic … 67#p201867

post #439.

That post was made on 2 / 12 / 2012 and was a Sunday. The poster mentions the Sunday before, that makes 2 / 5 / the pivotal day.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

That post was on 18th, which makes 12th the pivotal day...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Oh yes, the 12th. That will come around pretty quick.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

Yeah, but it's nothing special...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Why isn't it special?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,812

Why should it be?

And wouldn't it be better to continue in the Chatter?

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Nothing to continue about. I will make a forum announcement on that day.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mttal24****Member**- Registered: 2012-05-01
- Posts: 23

Wow! A lot of discussions on hmms.. in this post.

Now, the answer in the book says that the answer for question (1) is 1/2.

Is it right or there is a printing mistake?

*Last edited by mttal24 (2013-02-01 02:06:13)*

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Hi;

For which one?

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mttal24****Member**- Registered: 2012-05-01
- Posts: 23

^^just edited my earlier post. It is for the first one.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Hi;

Must be a typo, both of those limits are 0.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**mttal24****Member**- Registered: 2012-05-01
- Posts: 23

Thanks!

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,467

Hi;

You are welcome.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

Pages: **1**