Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #251 2013-01-10 13:32:37
Re: Hangman 1Can I have an M? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #252 2013-01-10 13:39:59#253 2013-01-10 13:40:57
Re: Hangman 1Math? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #254 2013-01-10 14:08:13
Re: Hangman 1yes. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #255 2013-01-10 14:32:52
Re: Hangman 1Give an R, please. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #256 2013-01-10 15:05:39
Re: Hangman 1i forgot!!! sorry. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #257 2013-01-10 15:10:31
Re: Hangman 1Give me an = sign. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #258 2013-01-10 15:11:29#259 2013-01-10 15:19:32
Re: Hangman 1Is there an m in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #260 2013-01-11 10:07:25
Re: Hangman 1No. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #261 2013-01-11 10:09:20
Re: Hangman 1Is there an x in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #262 2013-01-11 11:02:25#263 2013-01-11 11:05:32#264 2013-01-11 11:12:47
Re: Hangman 1And put that y in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #265 2013-01-11 12:03:48#266 2013-01-11 12:04:32
Re: Hangman 1No 0 and no y! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #267 2013-01-11 12:28:39#268 2013-01-11 12:32:38
Re: Hangman 1That x is a multiplication sign isn't it? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #269 2013-01-12 13:49:14
Re: Hangman 1Yeah. Star members have too many stars. So, if I congratulate new star members, so, that means I need more stars for my picture? #270 2013-01-12 14:08:07#271 2013-01-12 14:21:54
Re: Hangman 1I am stumped. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #272 2013-01-12 14:36:31
Re: Hangman 1Bobbym,its an equation like 3x+2=12....etc. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #273 2013-01-12 14:38:19
Re: Hangman 1Is there a 2? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #274 2013-01-12 14:50:18#275 2013-01-12 14:52:52
Re: Hangman 1Is there a decimal point? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |