Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #251 20130110 13:32:37
Re: Hangman 1Can I have an M? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #252 20130110 13:39:59#253 20130110 13:40:57
Re: Hangman 1Math? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #254 20130110 14:08:13#255 20130110 14:32:52
Re: Hangman 1Give an R, please. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #256 20130110 15:05:39#257 20130110 15:10:31
Re: Hangman 1Give me an = sign. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #258 20130110 15:11:29#259 20130110 15:19:32
Re: Hangman 1Is there an m in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #260 20130111 10:07:25#261 20130111 10:09:20
Re: Hangman 1Is there an x in there? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #262 20130111 11:02:25#263 20130111 11:05:32#264 20130111 11:12:47
Re: Hangman 1And put that y in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #265 20130111 12:03:48#266 20130111 12:04:32
Re: Hangman 1No 0 and no y! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #267 20130111 12:28:39#268 20130111 12:32:38
Re: Hangman 1That x is a multiplication sign isn't it? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #269 20130112 13:49:14
Re: Hangman 1Yeah. 246 pages on Prime Numbers Wiki (+1) #270 20130112 14:08:07#271 20130112 14:21:54
Re: Hangman 1I am stumped. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #272 20130112 14:36:31#273 20130112 14:38:19
Re: Hangman 1Is there a 2? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #274 20130112 14:50:18#275 20130112 14:52:52
Re: Hangman 1Is there a decimal point? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 