Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#201 2013-01-02 05:47:01
#202 2013-01-02 05:49:50
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
I will need an S.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#203 2013-01-02 06:30:22
#204 2013-01-02 06:34:19
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Do we have an N?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#205 2013-01-02 07:10:16
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Power Member
Online
Re: Hangman 1
s _ _ _ _ _ _ n
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#206 2013-01-02 07:13:59
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Is it scorpion?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#207 2013-01-02 07:51:39
#208 2013-01-02 08:02:37
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about a D?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#209 2013-01-04 12:47:01
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
s _ _ _ _\d _ _ n
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#210 2013-01-04 13:08:03
- cooljackiec
- Full Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
a?
I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something
#211 2013-01-04 13:26:48
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Hi;
Started with 8 letters now it has 9?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#212 2013-01-06 01:31:41
#213 2013-01-06 04:30:19
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
So this is what it looks like?
s _ _ _ d _ _ n
Is it showdown?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#214 2013-01-07 06:49:04
#215 2013-01-07 07:22:45
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Well where is the next one? I am raring to go.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#216 2013-01-07 07:56:28
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
The next one is already posted – a 2-letter word. (Or a two words each one-letter long. 
)
#217 2013-01-07 08:02:52
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
I see it now.
Is there an N?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#218 2013-01-07 15:21:56
#219 2013-01-07 15:30:03
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Is there an O?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#220 2013-01-08 10:06:42
#221 2013-01-08 10:49:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an i?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#222 2013-01-08 12:06:20
#223 2013-01-08 12:13:10
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Hi;
Is it by?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#224 2013-01-08 12:14:33
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Yes 
_ _ _ _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#225 2013-01-08 12:18:02
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Give me an S, please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.