Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

No

Hey.

## #202 2013-01-02 05:49:50

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

I will need an S.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

s _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Hey.

## #204 2013-01-02 06:34:19

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Do we have an N?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

Power Member
Online
Re: Hangman 1
s _ _ _ _ _ _ n

Hey.

## #206 2013-01-02 07:13:59

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Is it scorpion?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no

Hey.

## #208 2013-01-02 08:02:37

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #209 2013-01-04 12:47:01

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

s _ _ _ _\d _ _ n

Hey.

## #210 2013-01-04 13:08:03

cooljackiec
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

a?

I see you have graph paper.
You must be plotting something

## #211 2013-01-04 13:26:48

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Hi;

Started with 8 letters now it has 9?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no..typo

Hey.

## #213 2013-01-06 04:30:19

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

So this is what it looks like?

s _ _ _ d _ _ n

Is it showdown?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

yes.

_ _

Hey.

## #215 2013-01-07 07:22:45

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Well where is the next one? I am raring to go.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #216 2013-01-07 07:56:28

scientia
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

The next one is already posted – a 2-letter word. (Or a two words each one-letter long. )

## #217 2013-01-07 08:02:52

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

I see it now.

Is there an N?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

No

Hey.

## #219 2013-01-07 15:30:03

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Is there an O?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

no

Hey.

## #221 2013-01-08 10:49:07

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

OK. hint: b_

Hey.

## #223 2013-01-08 12:13:10

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Hi;

Is it by?

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #224 2013-01-08 12:14:33

mathgogocart
Super Member

Offline

### Re: Hangman 1

Yes

_ _   _ _ _ _, _ _  _ _ _

Hey.

bobbym

Offline