Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#176 2013-01-02 02:22:01
#177 2013-01-02 02:26:22
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
How about an H?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#178 2013-01-02 02:35:53
#179 2013-01-02 02:37:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Let me have an A.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#180 2013-01-02 02:44:04
#181 2013-01-02 02:45:42
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Ah Ha! So then you must have an "O"
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#182 2013-01-02 02:47:11
#183 2013-01-02 02:49:27
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
I am going to say we have an "N" in there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#184 2013-01-02 02:51:36
#185 2013-01-02 03:01:50
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Must be an "L" somewhere.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#186 2013-01-02 03:18:00
#187 2013-01-02 03:22:14
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Now I am close, give me that M, that I know is there.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#188 2013-01-02 03:42:21
#189 2013-01-02 03:44:38
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Is it moved?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#190 2013-01-02 03:55:15
#191 2013-01-02 03:59:07
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
#192 2013-01-02 04:06:14
#193 2013-01-02 04:07:37
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#194 2013-01-02 04:55:57
#195 2013-01-02 04:58:56
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Okay then there is an S!
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#196 2013-01-02 05:02:52
#197 2013-01-02 05:20:30
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Hi;
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#198 2013-01-02 05:25:49
- mathgogocart
- Super Member
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
Yes.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto.
#199 2013-01-02 05:27:33
- scientia
- Full Member
Offline
#200 2013-01-02 05:36:57
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Hangman 1
And a T, please.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.