Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #176 2013-01-02 02:22:01#177 2013-01-02 02:26:22
Re: Hangman 1How about an H? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #178 2013-01-02 02:35:53#179 2013-01-02 02:37:57
Re: Hangman 1Let me have an A. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #180 2013-01-02 02:44:04#181 2013-01-02 02:45:42
Re: Hangman 1Ah Ha! So then you must have an "O" In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #182 2013-01-02 02:47:11#183 2013-01-02 02:49:27
Re: Hangman 1I am going to say we have an "N" in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #184 2013-01-02 02:51:36#185 2013-01-02 03:01:50
Re: Hangman 1Must be an "L" somewhere. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #186 2013-01-02 03:18:00#187 2013-01-02 03:22:14
Re: Hangman 1Now I am close, give me that M, that I know is there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #188 2013-01-02 03:42:21#189 2013-01-02 03:44:38
Re: Hangman 1Is it moved? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #190 2013-01-02 03:55:15#191 2013-01-02 03:59:07
#192 2013-01-02 04:06:14#193 2013-01-02 04:07:37
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #194 2013-01-02 04:55:57#195 2013-01-02 04:58:56
Re: Hangman 1Okay then there is an S! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #196 2013-01-02 05:02:52#197 2013-01-02 05:20:30
Re: Hangman 1Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #198 2013-01-02 05:25:49
Re: Hangman 1Yes. woosh! woosh! bye as I go to Kanto. #199 2013-01-02 05:27:33
#200 2013-01-02 05:36:57
Re: Hangman 1And a T, please. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. |