Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #27 20121231 07:05:20
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteIt is possible to go up with a bigger sample size like 4000. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #29 20121231 07:09:56
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteIt is possible to go up to outside 4 sd or more with a bigger sample. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #31 20121231 07:20:42
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #33 20121231 07:30:10
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteSure, it can go to anything. What is it you want to know? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #35 20121231 07:38:46
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteThat is not exactly how it works. As I said as the sample size goes up the sd goes up. That is normal. Whether or not it is outside of 3 or 4 standard deviations is what counts. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #37 20121231 07:46:48
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteThe standard deviation is not what is important, what is important is how far your result is from the average. In your case 44 is more than 3 sd from the average (27) that means it only has 1 chance in 380 of being a random event. But that is not 0. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #39 20121231 07:54:56
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteThat has nothing to do with what we are talking about right now. That is a separate question. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #41 20121231 08:00:26
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteNot really. Based on the single sample you gave me of 44 out of 1000 hits with a probability of 1 / 37 I have answered the question. There is a only a 1 in 380 chance that that occurred by chance. Whether you feel that is enough is up to you. As I said it is not impossible that wheel is okay, just unlikely. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #42 20121231 08:11:13
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteWhat about 48/1000? #43 20121231 08:21:03
Re: binomial standard deviation in french roulette
That would be more than 4 sd away from the average. The chance that could happen by chance is about 1 / 15780. Quite rare.
You cannot yet assume that the sample mean is the actual average. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #45 20121231 08:32:16
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteBecause the sample size is larger than 30, in this case it is 1000, I would say we can expect that the true mean of that number to be 6/125 rather than 1 / 37. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #47 20121231 08:49:34
Re: binomial standard deviation in french roulette
No difference, except usually you do not use decimals. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #49 20121231 08:56:54
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteNo I do not. I was a [deleted]. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #50 20121231 09:03:29
Re: binomial standard deviation in french rouletteSo, as a [deleted], playing the basic strategy you would be able to be +1,5% over the HE. 