You are not logged in.
#1 2012-11-17 13:29:28
- 21122012
- Power Member
Offline
Mathematic of the XXI century
I live in Russia and I do not know many mathematical terms in English therefore I give the text in Russian
Last edited by 21122012 (2012-11-17 13:35:11)
"The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus"
Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it!
#2 2012-11-17 13:33:13
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Hi;
Why do you think that is an error?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#3 2012-11-17 13:37:03
- 21122012
- Power Member
Offline
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Excuse I write by means of the automatic translator
"The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus"
Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it!
#4 2012-11-17 13:40:55
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Hi;
I am sorry but my Russian is limited to some chess terms. Much worse than your English.
But I still have to say that my answer in post #2 is correct, notation wise. Therefore your statement in post#1 is not.
Who is the author of those papers you have cited?
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#5 2012-11-17 18:50:51
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
I have a Russian to Serbian dictionary. Maybe I could translate the paper later today...
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#6 2012-11-17 18:52:07
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Hi;
Maybe you should wait until the OP comes back.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#7 2012-11-17 20:38:13
- bob bundy
- Moderator
Offline
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
hi
I haven't followed the text but the mathematics seems to simplify down to
(half way down the text)
and
(and at the end)
Since there are no given limits and 'a' is treated as a constant here, I don't see any contradiction.
The difference is just a constant of integration.
Bob
You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei
#8 2012-11-17 21:11:40
- Fistfiz
- Member
Offline
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
21122012 wrote:
is error!
Hi endoftheworld,
I may be wrong, but I think stating that:
∫f(x)dx=F(x)+C
is an error, is itself a (logical) error. Because the indefinite integral is DEFINED AS the solution to the problem:
F'(x)=f(x)
It is the antiderivative, and what you gave is just the definition... does it make any sense to ask if is a definition right or wrong?
Saying that ∫f(x)dx=F(x)+C is an error seems to me like saying that it's wrong to put the ' to indicate the derivative...
I could have totally missed the point, maybe for example your paper says the defining the indefinite integral this way leads to some contradiction; in case i hope you can explain us.
30+2=28 (Mom's identity)
#9 2012-11-18 10:42:52
- 21122012
- Power Member
Offline
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Closed
"The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus"
Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it!
#10 2012-11-18 10:48:21
- bobbym
- Administrator
Online
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Hi;
You wish to close the thread? Okay, I have closed it.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.