Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #1 20121117 13:29:28
Mathematic of the XXI century
is error!
I live in Russia and I do not know many mathematical terms in English therefore I give the text in Russian Last edited by 21122012 (20121117 13:35:11) "The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus" Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it! #2 20121117 13:33:13
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #3 20121117 13:37:03
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryExcuse I write by means of the automatic translator "The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus" Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it! #4 20121117 13:40:55
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #5 20121117 18:50:51
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryI have a Russian to Serbian dictionary. Maybe I could translate the paper later today... The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #6 20121117 18:52:07
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #7 20121117 20:38:13
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryhi and (and at the end) Since there are no given limits and 'a' is treated as a constant here, I don't see any contradiction. The difference is just a constant of integration. Bob You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #8 20121117 21:11:40
Re: Mathematic of the XXI century
Hi endoftheworld, 30+2=28 (Mom's identity) #9 20121118 10:42:52
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryClosed "The conditions imposed on functions, become a source of difficulties which will manage to be avoided only by means of new researches about the principles of integral calculus" Thomas Ioannes Stiltes. ... I made it! #10 20121118 10:48:21
Re: Mathematic of the XXI centuryHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 