Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,622

Hi;

It is more useful to define it 0^0 = 1. The argument for this began with Euler who first said it. Here are a couple of more mathematicians:

http://www.askamathematician.com/2010/1 … -disagree/

Graham Knuth Patashnik wrote:

From Concrete Mathematics p.162 (R. Graham, D. Knuth, O. Patashnik):

Some textbooks leave the quantity 0^0 undefined, because the functions 0^x and x^0 have different limiting values when x decreases to 0. But this is a mistake. We must define x^0=1 for all x , if the binomial theorem is to be valid when x=0 , y=0 , and/or x=-y . The theorem is too important to be arbitrarily restricted! By contrast, the function 0^x is quite unimportant.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

**rapidcalculator.com**

Hi guys,

We added some cool new functions:

**1)** We added the ability to do summations (as suggested by anonimnystefy). For example, to do the sum

**2)** We added the ability to solve equations. This equation solving function is an exact solver. For example, to solve the equatoin

To do list:

1) Multiprecision (suggested by bobbym)

2) Coefficients (suggested by anonimnystefy)

3) Plotting for all variables (suggested by anonimnystefy）

4) Error message change (suggested by anonimnystefy)

Thanks again!

______________

**rapidcalculator.com ** ---- Try out this powerful mobile computational platform!

*Last edited by gauss_infinity (2012-11-01 14:33:35)*

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,622

Hi;

Very nice capability. How did you get MathJax integrated into your page?

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

hi bobbym,

we just followed the instructions on their webpage...

Thanks for trying our website!!!

______________

**rapidcalculator.com** ---- Try out this powerful mobile computational platform!

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,622

Hi;

You are welcome.

Okay, thanks. I will look at their site.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.**

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

Amazing online calculator.

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

Hi Shivamcoder3013,

Thanks for trying!

______________

rapidcalculator.com ---- Try out this powerful mobile computational platform!

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

No problem. It is the first online advanced calculator that I plan on being attune using that (other then when I have access to my 89 titanium or nspire).

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

Yup! We will be adding more features so stay tuned!

We also try to keep usage as intuitive as possible. Much of the usage patterns are actually very similar to TI-89 or softwares like MATLAB, Mathematica, Maple. The nesting of operations and command interpretation is the same, so hopefully you get used to it fast! Moreover, some heavy operations not possible on graphing calculators will be possible on this platform due to more processing power available.

__________________________

rapidcalculator.com -- Try out this powerful mobile computational platform!

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

0^0=1? Is this a glitch?

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

No it is not a glitch. 0^0 is indeterminate, but for most purposes any to the power of 0 is defined to be 1 so that is what we adopted as well.

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

Ah. Can you solve for x with it? Also, perhaps you should add a graphical interface. By the way, if you need some help coding it, feel free to ask.

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

what do you mean solve for

with it? btw thanks again.rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

Limits and random numbers would be nice to have as well...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

I meant a CAS interface. Lets say you type x+2=3. Solve for x.

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

and yup definitely, if we need help with coding we will definitely look around here

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

yes...just do poly_x[eqsolve(x+2-3,x)]

___________

rapidcalculator.com --- try out this powerful computational platform!

*Last edited by gauss_infinity (2012-11-02 13:20:12)*

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,622

I think you should stick with 0^0 =1 . Four mathematicians and Euler define it that way.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

Sure. I am quite proficient in PHP and JS, so I might be able to help. Also, I have coded a few online calcs myself.

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

hi anonimnystefy,

yea we will put that on our list as well....

thanks!

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**gauss_infinity****Member**- Registered: 2012-10-23
- Posts: 25

hi bobbym,

yea, we were about to hardcode it to indeterminate, but then realize most books actually use 1 for it haha so that is what we default to...

rapidcalculator.com - A powerful mobile computing platform for math and science

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

And yes, you should add limits.

Offline

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 14,836

You are welcome. And thank you for putting your effort into this. I am sure it will be astonishing.

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 81,622

Without it defined like that the binomial theorem would have problems.

I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.

All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

Offline

**ShivamS****Member**- Registered: 2011-02-07
- Posts: 3,411

Which 4 mathematicians?

Offline