Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ ¹ ² ³ °
 

You are not logged in. #2 20121027 21:53:46
Re: Integral of trigonometryHi Last edited by anonimnystefy (20121027 21:54:23) The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #3 20121027 22:00:10
Re: Integral of trigonometryHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #4 20121027 23:31:28
Re: Integral of trigonometryI wonder how WA got their series. This certainly does not look very nice. Unless there is some sort of extraordinarily clever substitution that can be made here. #5 20121027 23:40:10
Re: Integral of trigonometryHi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #6 20121027 23:42:42
Re: Integral of trigonometryI see. #7 20121027 23:45:11
Re: Integral of trigonometryI have emailed them several times to not put any restrictions on the site such as that. Seems like every time I did they took something away. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #9 20121027 23:50:27
Re: Integral of trigonometryYou might be right. Corporate boobs think only in terms of money. They only know two ways to make it. Charge for what is currently free and raise the price on what isn't. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #10 20121027 23:53:38
Re: Integral of trigonometryI hope I am wrong, it has always been my quick goto way of checking my answers. #11 20121027 23:54:42
Re: Integral of trigonometryCorrect, that is one use of a CAS! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. #12 20121028 00:13:40
Re: Integral of trigonometryActually,my brother challenged me to solve it,and I couldn't solve it,so I came here for help. #13 20121028 00:15:25
Re: Integral of trigonometryIt looks like something that he made up on the spot and he probably does not have a solution at hand. #14 20121028 01:01:51
Re: Integral of trigonometryIt is probable nobody has a solution (other than WA's series). The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. “It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman “Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment #15 20121028 07:53:32
Re: Integral of trigonometryHi;
I think you should rechallenge your brother and humbly ask him for the solution. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it. All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof. 