Another question: why the scientists haven't revealed a strategy for the chess?

Logic:
You are playing two chess games at the same time (first you move in the first, then your from the first moves then you move in the second then the second opponent moves and you get back to the first and so on)
Give a strategy (it's logical) when you are black in the first game and white in the second to be sure you'll get at least one point at the end.

krassi_holmz wrote:

Logic:
You are playing two chess games at the same time (first you move in the first, then your from the first moves then you move in the second then the second opponent moves and you get back to the first and so on)
Give a strategy (it's logical) when you are black in the first game and white in the second to be sure you'll get at least one point at the end.

I saw Derren Brown do that a while ago, except it was against 9 grandmasters. He played 8 of them against each other using the above strategy 4 times and somehow managed to beat the last one by himself.

ganesh wrote:

You are correct, siva.eas.
I posted that in a hurry. A minor mistake. The first move should be
1. e4, e6

It still would not work, white cold block the check by moving its bishop to f7.

MathsIsFun wrote:

Wanna practice (1)? Go to: Knights Move (I got 67after a *few* attempts)

Wow! I got 65! Very interesting game, MathsIsFun, thanks for the game.

I have done better than that before. I started with the position of the knight as it is at the start of a game and did it in 63 moves!

Mathematicians are supposed to be chess wizards. I'd say its a myth.

I always loose chess games by making one little mistake and blowing the game. Same as I do when I mess up a math problem. Only takes one tiny mistake to get a problem wrong.

Yeah, like forgetting to add + C to the answer of an integration problem. x_x