Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

You are not logged in.

engrymbiff
Member

Offline

How to do this?

## #2 2011-08-20 20:20:36

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Hi;

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #3 2012-10-13 22:28:25

engrymbiff
Member

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Sorry, that didn't help me..

## #4 2012-10-13 22:40:04

Agnishom
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Hi Bobbym,
Is it okay to start with the thing we are trying to prove?

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'
'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'
'Who are you to judge everything?' -Alokananda

## #5 2012-10-13 22:48:13

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Hi;

This is the problem:

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #6 2012-10-14 01:22:40

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Hi bobbym

I think what Agnishom wanted to ask you is whether it is okay to start the proof with what we want to prove and work our way to a true statement...

The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

## #7 2012-10-14 01:29:10

bobbym

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Hi anonimnystefy;

I missed that. I am sorry about that. Bob and I had a good discussion on that and it seems better to work backwards in that case. Even though they do work forwards a lot in inequality books.

In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.

## #8 2012-10-15 04:15:30

engrymbiff
Member

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

Hm... I really cannot solve it, I have a vague memory of how I solved it last time but now I don't have a good clue of how...

## #9 2012-10-15 22:55:57

scientia
Full Member

Offline

### Re: Show that (413)^(1/3)>6+3^(1/3)

I have a very weird solution; you probably won't like it but I'll have a go anyway.

Let
.

Then
because
.

Let
.

We find
(just). It follows that
since the quadratic function is strictly increasing for positive x.

The LHS is
and so we are done.