You are not logged in.

- Topics: Active | Unanswered

Pages: **1**

**engrymbiff****Member**- Registered: 2010-06-14
- Posts: 28

How to do this?

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 91,501

Hi;

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

**Online**

**engrymbiff****Member**- Registered: 2010-06-14
- Posts: 28

Sorry, that didn't help me..

Offline

Hi Bobbym,

Is it okay to start with the thing we are trying to prove?

'And fun? If maths is fun, then getting a tooth extraction is fun. A viral infection is fun. Rabies shots are fun.'

'God exists because Mathematics is consistent, and the devil exists because we cannot prove it'

'You have made another human being happy. There is no greater accomplishment.' -bobbym

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 91,501

Hi;

This is the problem:

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

**Online**

**anonimnystefy****Real Member**- From: The Foundation
- Registered: 2011-05-23
- Posts: 15,796

Hi bobbym

I think what Agnishom wanted to ask you is whether it is okay to start the proof with what we want to prove and work our way to a true statement...

Here lies the reader who will never open this book. He is forever dead.

Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most. ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

The knowledge of some things as a function of age is a delta function.

Offline

**bobbym****Administrator**- From: Bumpkinland
- Registered: 2009-04-12
- Posts: 91,501

Hi anonimnystefy;

I missed that. I am sorry about that. Bob and I had a good discussion on that and it seems better to work backwards in that case. Even though they do work forwards a lot in inequality books.

Unfortunately, whatever brilliant idea I had about this problem 1 year ago, I can not remember it at all.

**In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.**

**I agree with you regarding the satisfaction and importance of actually computing some numbers. I can't tell you how often I see time and money wasted because someone didn't bother to run the numbers.**

**Online**

**engrymbiff****Member**- Registered: 2010-06-14
- Posts: 28

Hm... I really cannot solve it, I have a vague memory of how I solved it last time but now I don't have a good clue of how...

Offline

**scientia****Member**- Registered: 2009-11-13
- Posts: 222

I have a very weird solution; you probably won't like it but I'll have a go anyway.

Let .

Then

because .Let

.We find

(just). It follows that since the quadratic function is strictly increasing for positiveThe LHS is

and so we are done.Offline

Pages: **1**