Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: χ Χ ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ π -Ή ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2012-09-17 06:10:51
0.999... = 1? Or not?My personal view- Last edited by Smartiebell (2012-09-17 07:48:14) #2 2012-09-17 06:47:42
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #3 2012-09-17 06:54:46
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?There IS Last edited by Smartiebell (2012-09-17 06:55:42) #4 2012-09-17 06:58:19
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #5 2012-09-17 07:11:42
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Agree. #6 2012-09-17 07:13:05
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Hmmm, there is alot of room in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #7 2012-09-17 07:20:22
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Yeah, I have never disagreed with that. Last edited by Smartiebell (2012-09-17 07:21:38) #8 2012-09-17 07:23:40
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Very good! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2012-09-17 07:30:51
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Thats what I wrote, right?!?! #10 2012-09-17 07:32:32
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Hi;
You have two decimal points in there. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2012-09-17 07:35:56
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?What do you mean? #13 2012-09-17 07:37:42
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #14 2012-09-17 07:41:56
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?ok. #15 2012-09-17 07:42:52
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Hi; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #16 2012-09-17 07:44:43
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Yes. I just got a glimpse of (cue mystical music) The world of MAATH! #17 2012-09-17 07:46:08
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Oh cool, I just turned into a Member! #18 2012-09-17 07:48:10
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Congratulations! In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #19 2012-09-17 07:49:38
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Soo... let the people who have a problem with the idea cometh here! Cause I just figured it out, and I like to hear new ideas. #20 2012-09-17 07:51:35
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Very few who come in here with that problem can ever come around to any new ideas. Last edited by bobbym (2013-02-17 00:42:35) In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2013-01-30 22:18:06
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?All the phony proofs in favour of 0.999... being equal to 1 are easily refuted: #22 2013-01-30 22:29:08
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?I think that 0.999... = 1. - n872yt3r Math Is Fun Rocks! By the power of the exponent, I square and cube you! #23 2013-01-31 00:21:00
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?
Interesting paper, John. Though I'll admit I'm skeptical. by induction -- which does make sense to me. Where I start to have my doubts is where you show that is absurd. Didn't you only prove for the natural numbers? #24 2013-01-31 00:30:53
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?hi john_gabriel You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #25 2013-01-31 01:08:06
Re: 0.999... = 1? Or not?Also a good point is that we should "ban" 0.999..., and similar numbers (that end with 9 recurring), because we would then have one representation in decimal notation for every number. The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't. It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about! ― Richard Feynman A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept. ― Carlos Ruiz Zafσn |