Math Is Fun Forum
  Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun.   Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °

Login

Username

Password

Not registered yet?

#51 2012-07-25 23:06:35

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Evaluate this integral

Maple, does it all for you  ( the latexing ). So does M and M.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#52 2012-07-25 23:19:20

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Evaluate this integral

I know about M&M, but my M doesn't alwaysgive it out correctly.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
 

#53 2012-07-26 05:44:24

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Evaluate this integral

M did a really weird job and when I tried to correct it ad hoc many little mistakes were made.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

#54 2012-07-26 06:05:01

anonimnystefy
Real Member

Offline

Re: Evaluate this integral

Okay.


The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“Taking a new step, uttering a new word, is what people fear most.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment
 

#55 2012-07-26 06:10:40

bobbym
Administrator

Offline

Re: Evaluate this integral

The integral is done correctly. It only took two substitutions and a partial fraction decomposition.


In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
All physicists, and a good many quite respectable mathematicians are contemptuous about proof.
 

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB