Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
You are not logged in.
#51 2012-07-25 23:06:35
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Evaluate this integral
Maple, does it all for you ( the latexing ). So does M and M.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#52 2012-07-25 23:19:20
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Evaluate this integral
I know about M&M, but my M doesn't alwaysgive it out correctly.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#53 2012-07-26 05:44:24
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Evaluate this integral
M did a really weird job and when I tried to correct it ad hoc many little mistakes were made.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.
#54 2012-07-26 06:05:01
- anonimnystefy
- Real Member
Offline
Re: Evaluate this integral
Okay.
The limit operator is just an excuse for doing something you know you can't.
“It's the subject that nobody knows anything about that we can all talk about!” ― Richard Feynman
“A secret's worth depends on the people from whom it must be kept.” ― Carlos Ruiz Zafón
#55 2012-07-26 06:10:40
- bobbym
- Administrator
Offline
Re: Evaluate this integral
The integral is done correctly. It only took two substitutions and a partial fraction decomposition.
In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them.
90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics.
I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on.