Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2005-12-30 10:06:37
Inverse Functions!??hi..I need help with these two questions from my Review Sheet... #2 2005-12-30 10:29:38
Re: Inverse Functions!??I way: IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #3 2005-12-30 10:34:02
Re: Inverse Functions!??2) x^2 hasn't inverse function because there exist two solutions of IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #4 2005-12-30 10:37:20
Re: Inverse Functions!??But we may say: IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #5 2005-12-30 10:43:25
Re: Inverse Functions!??Plots: Last edited by krassi_holmz (2005-12-30 10:49:36) IPBLE: Increasing Performance By Lowering Expectations. #6 2005-12-30 11:43:22
Re: Inverse Functions!??Two ways you can prove it? The only way I know is this: Last edited by mikau (2005-12-30 11:43:51) A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm. #7 2005-12-30 11:54:24
Re: Inverse Functions!??Ah, I forgot. The graphs of an inverse function is the graph of the original function, reflected about the line y = x. So you could also draw a graph of the two functions and determine whether they appear to be relfections about the line y = x. Last edited by mikau (2005-12-30 12:15:07) A logarithm is just a misspelled algorithm. |