Discussion about math, puzzles, games and fun. Useful symbols: ÷ × ½ √ ∞ ≠ ≤ ≥ ≈ ⇒ ± ∈ Δ θ ∴ ∑ ∫ • π ƒ -¹ ² ³ °
| |
|
|
You are not logged in. #1 2011-09-05 14:56:50
Snubbed!http://mathoverflow.net/questions/71092 … t-60-parts In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #2 2011-09-05 15:34:03
Re: Snubbed!Unbelievable that DZ forgot to google! "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #3 2011-09-05 17:50:32
Re: Snubbed!Hi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #4 2011-09-05 18:16:32
Re: Snubbed!hi bobbym,
But then in the thread:
So you can only post there if you know a question has an answer but don't know what it is. That's a major limit on what can be posted. And if anyone challenges a post, how's the poster supposed to prove his post was valid. Last edited by bob bundy (2011-09-05 18:24:39) You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #5 2011-09-05 18:36:45
Re: Snubbed!Hi bob bundy; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #6 2011-09-05 18:41:13
Re: Snubbed!hi bobbym,
In fact, doesn't that also rule out anyone trying to object to a post too? Last edited by bob bundy (2011-09-05 18:43:47) You cannot teach a man anything; you can only help him find it within himself..........Galileo Galilei #7 2011-09-05 20:09:11
Re: Snubbed!Hi,
No, I haven't seen him lecture yet. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #8 2011-09-05 21:25:53
Re: Snubbed!If your hearing is good, he has finally taken my advice and gone to youtube. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #9 2011-09-05 21:44:33
Re: Snubbed!You mean he is a registered user there? "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #10 2011-09-05 21:52:40
Re: Snubbed!Hi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #11 2011-09-05 21:58:57
Re: Snubbed!Okay. but I didn't get his username. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #12 2011-09-05 21:59:30
Re: Snubbed!What was it? Shalosh? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #13 2011-09-05 22:28:30
Re: Snubbed!Youtube username? "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #14 2011-09-05 22:29:04
Re: Snubbed!Was Shalosh the name he is under? In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #15 2011-09-05 22:37:12
Re: Snubbed!But the user "Shalosh" has no videos, and country and age dowsn't match with that of DZ. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #16 2011-09-05 22:39:17
Re: Snubbed!That is strange. Shalosh is definitely him. He used to publish under that name to avoid being turned down. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #17 2011-09-05 22:47:06
Re: Snubbed!Are we talking about youtube here? "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #18 2011-09-05 22:49:41
Re: Snubbed!Yes, youtube. It could be a copycat. But that is an alias he used professionally. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #19 2011-09-05 22:57:44
Re: Snubbed!Yes, may be an imposter, if it wasn't linked from DZ's website. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #20 2011-09-05 22:58:17
Re: Snubbed!It is linked to his site? Then it is him. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #21 2011-09-05 23:11:39
Re: Snubbed!
I was telling it's not! "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #22 2011-09-05 23:13:20
Re: Snubbed!Shalosh Ekhad was an alias he published articles under. Actually they were computer programs that solved the problems. They are not exactly him but sort of an alter ego. In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #23 2011-09-05 23:24:40
Re: Snubbed!I know Shalosh B. Ekhad, isn't it his computer rather than his programs? "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." #24 2011-09-05 23:26:19
Re: Snubbed!Hi gAr; In mathematics, you don't understand things. You just get used to them. 90% of mathematicians do not understand 90% of currently published mathematics. I am willing to wager that over 75% of the new words that appeared were nothing more than spelling errors that caught on. #25 2011-09-05 23:35:21
Re: Snubbed!Okay. "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense" - Buddha? "Data! Data! Data!" he cried impatiently. "I can't make bricks without clay." |